Know what is in your environment

November 2, 2010

Home improvement products found with lead, cadmium and phthalates

Lead, cadmium and other heavy metals and chemicals have been found in home improvement products such as flooring, tile and wallpaper.  Healthystuff.org, a non-profit organization researching toxic chemicals in everyday products tested 1016 flooring products and 2312 types of wallpaper and lead, cadmium and phthalates were found.

In similar testing, Essco Safety Check has also found heavy metals in tile and wallpaper.  On July 13, 2010 Essco Safety Check posted a blog entitled “Warning to homeowners, renovators, and contractors: beware of lead and other heavy metals in tile.”  The State of Washington Department of Commerce Lead Lines Volume 3, Issue 1 October 2010 published (on page 3) Essco Safety Checks findings on tile and our recommendations to contractors and homeowners.

There are currently no federal standards for lead, cadmium or phthalates in home improvement products, according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).  Yet there are regulations for lead in children’s products, currently with a total content limit of 300ppm and 90ppm for painted surfaces. 

As long as the tile is not disturbed, or children are directly “licking” the surface of the tile, there should be no direct harm.  However, if the tile is disturbed or children have direct hand-to-mouth or direct mouth contact, there is a potential for harm.

There are new federal regulations regarding lead found in properties older than 1978.  The renovation, repair and painting rule (RRP) went into effect to address lead dust hazards created during renovation of properties older than 1978, this rule only applies to painted surfaces.  Tile, flooring and wallpaper are not considered painted surfaces, but each can potentially possess harmful heavy metals of chemicals.

Healthystuff.org found that more than half of the wallpaper tested contained one or more hazardous chemicals and that 1 in 8 contained cadmium above 100ppm.  Of the vinyl flooring testing, 15% contained one or more hazardous chemicals compared to 8% for non-vinyl flooring.  Healthstuff.org found that linoleum, cork, bamboo and hardwood floorings all tested negative for lead and cadmium.

Lead found in the left tile, cadmium found in the right tile

In similar testing, Essco Safety Check has found tile to contain lead with a total content limit of over 2.4%, testing was done using an X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzer. 

Additionally, we have found lead and cadmium to be present in wallpaper.  This testing was not done on new wallpaper, but wallpaper found currently in people’s homes.  In one case, we found that the wallpaper present in several parts of a home contained lead, cadmium antimony and was found to be PVC which may indicate the presence of phthalates.

Know what is in your environment and mitigate harm!

Share


Essco Safety Check

September 19, 2010

XRF testing helps find mercury in facial creams

Have you ever wondered if your favorite coffee cup, you know the one you drink out of every day, has any lead in it?    Are you curious if the toys your children are playing with have any potentially harmful heavy metals like lead or cadmium?  What about the facial or topical creams you apply to your body? Do you ever stop and think what is in your environment and how your environment may affect your health or life?

Three years ago I started a business, Environmental Services & Solutions Corporation (otherwise known as Essco Safety Check) to provide X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) testing services to moms and dads, to help them know what was in their environment.  XRF analyzers use X-Rays to non-destructively detect heavy metals in virtually anything.  Our handheld XRF analyzers, from Olympus Innov-X, are essentially a hand-held mass spectrometer capable of detecting elements from 15 to 94 on the periodic chart. 

Since 2007, when Essco Safety Check started, we have added testing services that help businesses, industries and government, as well as, developing a sophisticated software platform to collect and analyze environmental data in a cloud-based system.  We have been specifically involved with consumer product testing helping businesses affected by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) and contractors, painters, remodelers, home inspector and homeowners affected by the Renovation, Repair & Painting (RRP) Rule, among many other types of XRF testing.

Essco Safety Check has been involved with several national recalls for lead and cadmium and has had many discussions with the CPSC, FDA, EPA, state and local agencies about different environmental issues.  Our testing has found lead and cadmium in toys, ceramics, jewelry, painted surfaces, metal objects, cookware, medical products and more.  We have provided testimony at state hearings, have worked with advocacy groups, provided community testing events and have been on hundreds of job sites.  With all of this experience using XRF analyzers, you would have thought I would have learned never to be surprised what you may find.   Yet, you may be wrong…I may not always be surprised what I find, I may be disgusted.

Recently, Essco Safety Check was contacted to help provide XRF testing of facial creams from Southeast Asia to look for mercury.  My initial concern with this project was that we would not find mercury because levels of mercury would be below our detection capabilities.  The XRF analyzers that we use have detection limitations in the parts per million (PPM) and I suspected that the levels of mercury in the facial creams would be in the parts per billion (PPB).  I was informed that the levels of mercury in some of the suspected facial creams with mercury were greater than one percent. 

1 % = 10,000 (PPM)

After several discussions with the parties involved, samples of six different facial creams (skin whitening creams) were sent to Essco Safety Check’s office.  Testing proceeded and you know what?

I was disgusted. 

In three of the samples that were tested, levels of mercury were detectible, greater than 600 PPM.  Two of the samples were found to contain more than 8,000 PPM and one sample was found to contain over 15,000 PPM or 1.5% mercury.  This is a product that is applied to the face and it has high levels of mercury.

Mercury is banned in skin-bleaching or lightening products, such a product would have words listed on the packaging as “lightening” or “whitening”, if these words are not listed, it is considered a cosmetic.   Eye area cosmetics are permitted to have concentrations of mercury not exceeding 65 PPM if it is used as a preservative, and only if no other preservative is available for use.  All other cosmetics are only permitted trace amounts of mercury, less than 1 PPM.

Essco Safety Check was initially contacted to help determine if certain facial creams had levels of mercury, because people who were using these creams appear to be suffering from mercury poisoning.  Some symptoms of mercury poisoning are; metallic taste, vomiting, difficulty breathing, bad cough, swollen or bleeding gums and if enough mercury is ingested in your blood stream, kidney and brain damage may occur.  Often with modest exposure, there is no oblivious effect.  However, in one extreme recent case in Cambodia a young lady died apparently from a hypersensitive response to mercury in a skin whitener, identified as Bao Dam from Vietnam [1].  The creams Essco Safety Check evaluated were apparently from Vietnam, Thailand and China but they may have been bootlegged and produced anywhere.  Mercury is readily absorbed through the skin in a topical application and mercury can accumulate in the body.

In May of this year, the Chicago Tribune did an investigation of 50 skin-lightening creams by purchasing these facial creams in Chicago stores.  Five of the creams were found to contain amounts mercury greater than 6,000 PPM.   They are:

  • Crème Diana C.T.R. – manufactured in Lebanon – 6,900 PPM
  • Ling Ji Su containers – manufactured in China – 6,530 PPM (white cream); 6,090 PPM (yellow cream)
  • Lulanjina – manufactured in China – 14,700 PPM (yellow cream); 14,100 PPM (white cream)
  • Stillman’s Skin Bleach Cream – manufactured in Pakistan – 29,600 PPM
  • Top-Gel MCA Extra Pearl Cream – manufactured in Taiwan – 7,030 PPM
  • The FDA did respond to this investigation.

    This is just another example of why you would want to know what is in your environment.  XRF testing helps people and businesses know what is in their environment.   We have the potential to help governments with limited regulations learn about product safety and help create regulations that will protect citizens, workers and the environment, while saving time and money.  XRF testing can create jobs and improve people’s lives.

    Know what is in your environment and mitigate harm.

    [1] http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/34119/skin-cream-linked-to-bride-death

    Share


    Essco Safety Check

    June 8, 2010

    Heavy Metals found in Protein Drinks

    An investigation by Consumer Reports has found lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury in fifteen different protein drinks.  Some of these drinks can potentially pose health problems over time (consumption of heavy metals and excessive protein).  These drinks were all sold as “ready-to-drink” liquids or powders and had varying levels of heavy metals (from low to moderate).  Dietary supplements have voluntary standards for health products, which are set by the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) and protein drinks and other dietary supplements are not required to be tested before they are sold.

    Three out of the fifteen drinks tested were found to contain levels of heavy metals above the USP limits for lead, cadmium or arsenic.  These drinks are commonly used by athletes, baby boomers, pregnant women and teenagers.  The proposed limits set by the USP for lead are 10 micrograms per day; the proposed limit for cadmium is 5 micrograms per day; the proposed limit for arsenic is 15 micrograms per day.

    One drink was found to contain 16.9 micrograms of arsenic and 5.1 micrograms of cadmium.  Another drink was found to contain all three metals with 13.5 micrograms of lead, 5.6 micrograms of cadmium and 12.2 micrograms of arsenic.  And a third drink was found to contain 12.2 micrograms of lead and 11.2 micrograms of arsenic.  All findings are based on three servings per day and all samples were either purchased in the New York metro area or online.

    It appears that the federal government is not protecting the consumer and better regulation or oversight of “consumer products” such as protein shakes, toothbrushes, or baby spoons should be common sense and is needed.  But lack of regulations has cause states to write their own, more strict regulations.  According to this study by Consumer Reports, eight of the fifteen drinks would be required by Proposition 65 (California Law) to have manufacturers notify consumers because of lead content.

    This investigation was prompted by Dr. Kathy Burns, a Boston-area Toxicologist and founder of Sciencecorps and Judy Braiman of Empire State Consumer Project.   

    To view the report from Consumer Reports, please visit.  To view the press release from Consumer Reports, please visit.

    This is just another “consumer product” that is not a consumer product and Essco Safety Check is working to help people and businesses know what is in their environment and mitigate potential harm.

    Share

    Essco Safety Check

    April 6, 2010

    Do you know what is in your kitchen?

    Filed under: Health, News, viewpoint — Tags: , , , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 11:05 am

    Let me start by saying that I am not trying to scare anyone, I just want to provide information about what we find during environmental inspections that my company performs.  It is ultimately up to you to understand your environment and make educated decisions as to what you and your children are exposed to. 

    In the past few years, we have heard all too frequently about lead and now cadmium found in children’s toys and children’s jewelry.  Children’s products are regulated by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) which limits the amount of certain heavy metals in consumer products designed for children 12 years of age and younger.  In my experience, toys typically have lower amounts and frequency of possessing lead, but do you know what is in your kitchen?

    Recently I was out performing an in-home inspection specifically looking for lead for a family that had three young children, all with lead found in their blood.   My company (Essco Safety Check) specializes in using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers, which is a non-destructive, accurate, efficient testing source to determine if specific elements such as lead, cadmium, arsenic or mercury are present in virtually anything (toys, ceramics, jewelry, soil, structures, etc).   In this particular home, there was actually very little lead found in the children’s products or in the structure of the home. 

    When we provide testing, we typically want to test the items that people, specifically children are routinely exposed to.  I want to test the things that children put in their mouths, the items that they have regular contact with and could potentially be a source of harm.  I never hope to find lead or other harmful toxicants, but it is typically found in the average home in a variety of different products, substrates and locations.  I’m not here to say that these toxicants are going to harm or have harmed anyone; however, if present they maybe a potential source of harm.

    After testing most of the children’s products that are used regularly and specifically placed in their children’s mouth, I proceeded to the kitchen to further analyze items that could potentially be the source of lead in the children.  Now in my experience, the kitchen typically possesses the most amounts of potentially harmful metals, specifically in ceramics.  This home did have some heavy metals in their ceramics, and in one case, a ceramic piece of cookware was found with lead over 5500 PPM. 

    With a ceramic, the most important thing to look at (besides the elemental makeup) is the condition of the glaze.  If the condition of the glaze of a ceramic is not compromised, you should not have to worry about the makeup of that ceramic.  However, if the ceramic in question has a compromised glaze (there is a crack, chip or blemish) you should take note of what that ceramic is made of.  Unfortunately the only way to know what the ceramic is made of is to have it tested.

    The ceramic found with lead did have a compromised glaze, and the owner decided not to use this item any more (it was given to me to use as an educational display piece).  But in this kitchen I found something that I’ve never seen before.   I found lead in a plastic ladle! 

    Black plastic ladle found with lead (750 PPM)

    Black plastic ladle found with lead (750 PPM)

    I’ve seen lead all over the place in the home and specifically the kitchen, but not in a serving utensil.  I’ve found lead and other toxicants (cadmium and arsenic) in ceramics, pots and pans and even a cutting board.  I’ve had conversations with toxicologists and elemental specialists from the FDA.  Do you know that your coffee cup is regulated by the FDA (inside of the cup) and CPSC (outside of the cup)?

    The amount of lead found in the ladle was approximately 750 PPM.  This level is over twice the total content level for a children’s product (CPSIA), but this product is not regulated as a child’s product.  I’m not suggesting that this ladle is even the source of this specific case of lead found in children’s blood, but lead was found in a product that is exposed to a variety of different heat conditions , as well as, the potential for acids (like tomato soup) and children are exposed to  and this type of product.

    As I said at the beginning, I am not here to scare anyone; I am here to provide insight and knowledge.  I’m not saying that the ladle or cookware was the cause of lead in the children from this home, but lead was found in the kitchen and in consumer products that children are exposed to on a regular basis.

    Do you know what is in your kitchen?

    Share

    Powered by WordPress