Know what is in your environment

May 6, 2010

Handmade Toy Alliance Press Release

I am reposting a blog/press release from our friends at the Handmade Toy Alliance (HTA).  Several board members met with the House Energy Commerce Sub-Committee on consumer protection last week to discuss new pending regulations, the Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act (CPSEA).  Essco Safety Check completely agrees with the HTA that alternative testing methods, such as X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzers, can help with the survival of small businesses.  XRF analyzers and the data they provide can help keep businesses compliant with regulations, lower testing costs, protect children and help get their products to market faster than traditional, expensive and destructive testing methods.

Please visit www.handmadetoyalliance.org for more information

HTA Press Release: “We strongly urge both sides to work through their differences and move forward on this important reform of the CPSIA”

The Handmade Toy Alliance (HTA) testified on April 29th at the

HTA in Washington D.C. April 29th, 2010

House Energy and Commerce Sub-Committee hearing regarding the Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act (CPSEA). HTA Founder and Vice President, Dan Marshall (Peapods Natural Toys -MN), Board member Jolie Fay (Skipping Hippos – OR) and Board member Randy Hertzler (euroSource – PA) traveled to DC to participate in this very important process.

“The HTA has endorsed the Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act”, Marshall stated during his testimony before the Sub-Committee. “The provisions of the bill which allow alternative testing methods for small batch manufacturers are imperative to the survival of our members.” Marshall went on to share various aspects of report language that would further serve to clarify Congress’ intentions with the amendment.

In the few days since the hearing, however, Democrats and Republicans on the committee have signaled that they might not be willing to negotiate a bipartisan bill. “We strongly urge both sides to work through their differences and move forward on this important reform of the CPSIA,” said Jill Chuckas (Crafty Baby -CT), HTA Secretary. “The livelihoods of thousands of families hang in the balance.”

In addition to testimony from the HTA, the Sub-Committee heard from representatives from Goodwill Industries, the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), American Apparel and Footwear (AAFA), Motorcycle Industries, Consumers Federation of America (CFA) and Rick Woldenberg (Chairman, Learning Resources).

Following opening statements, there was a question and answer period which focused around the difficulties of small batch manufacturers and specialty retailers to understand and comply with the CPSIA. “We were pleased to hear a series of questions surrounding harmonization with EN-71 which is of special concern to those in our membership who import product directly from the European Union,” stated Hertzler. “Dan (Marshall) had the opportunity to discuss this issue in depth.”

HTA Board members also had the opportunity to visit with many of the House Committee members, as well as a number of members of the Senate Commerce Committee. “It was an incredibly busy few days, squeezing in as many legislative visits as possible,” Fay shared. Marshall added “Our focus was to share the HTA story and collective concerns with a large number of Congressional members, furthering our efforts to provide relief to small batch manufacturers, crafters and specialty retailers. It has been clear from the beginning that we were not the intended targets of this legislation, but unfortunately, our members have the most to lose. It is time to remedy these unintended consequences of the CPSIA.”

The House Sub-committee will now decide whether or not to move forward with mark up and presentation of the Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act (CPSEA), as the bill has been named, to the House floor. “Our focus now is to help this process proceed quickly,” Marshall continued. “It has been a very long road to common sense changes to the CPSIA. The Subcommittee members now need to openly discuss this bill, come to an agreement and move forward. The time for waiting is over. Congress needs to move swiftly to fix the issues with the CPSIA.”

Share

Essco Safety Check

March 26, 2010

CPSC held a webinar today – A guide for small businesses for complying with the CPSIA.

Filed under: Events, News, Regulation — Tags: , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 12:01 pm

Today, Friday, March 26, 2010, 11:00 a.m. EDT the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) held a webinar to help small businesses understand complying with the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), specifically with the Handmade Toy Alliance (HTA).

Gib Mullan, Assistant Executive Director, Office of Compliance and Field Operations for the U.S. CPSC gave the presentation as a “flow chart” and a “guide to help” webinar attendees understand which requirements apply to their products.

Essco Safety Check did not submit any specific questions for this webinar, but is constantly fielding questions about the CPSIA from small businesses.  It is our goal as a company to help businesses know what their products are made of using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzers.

Here are some highlights to what the CPSC presented and where to find the specific information as well as some questions asked.
——————————————————————————————————————————————

The first basic question is do you make a children’s product? 

A “children’s product” means a consumer product designed or intended primarily for children 12 years of age or younger. In determining whether a consumer product is primarily intended for a child 12 years of age or younger, the following factors will be considered:

• A statement by the manufacturer about the intended use of the product, including a label on the product if such statement is reasonable.
• Whether the product is represented in its packaging, display, promotion or advertising as appropriate for use by children 12 years of age or younger.
• Whether the product is commonly recognized by consumers as being intended for use by a child 12 years of age or younger.

Requirements include:

CPSIA Section 101. Children’s Products Containing Lead; Lead Paint Rule http

CPSIA Section 102. Mandatory Third Party Testing for Certain Children’s Products 

CPSIA Section 103. Tracking Labels for Children’s Products 

Statement of Policy: Testing and Certification of Lead Content in Children’s Products

Section 101 of the CPSIA says that products designed or intended primarily for children 12 years old and younger (“children’s products”) cannot contain more than 300 parts per million (ppm) of lead in any accessible part, this is the “lead content limit.”  In addition to the 300 ppm content limit, there is a 90 ppm limit on lead in paint used on certain products such as furniture and children’s toys.

The CPSC issued guidance in August, 2009 to determine accessible parts.  

There have been determinations to identify materials whole lead content will not exceed 100 ppm and they include natural products, dyed and un-dyed textiles, cotton, wool, wood, paper, precious and semi precious stones.

But they do not include metal or plastic fasteners such as buttons, screws, grommets or sippers used in apparel or elsewhere.

Section 102 – Mandatory third party testing for certain children’s products.

Children’s products must be certified based on testing by a recognized third party test laboratory.  These requirements are being phased in over time.

Lead limits on most children’s products do not have to be certified until 2/10/2011 However, children’s jewelry must be certified to the 300 ppm lead content limit if that product was manufactured after 8/14/09 and any painted product would need to meet 90 ppm lead content limit.

Third-Party Testing of Children’s Products

The new legislation imposes an additional third-party testing requirement for all consumer products primarily intended for children twelve years of age or younger. Every manufacturer (including an importer) or private labeler of a children’s product must have its product tested by an accredited independent testing lab and, based on the testing, must issue a certificate that the product meets all applicable CPSC requirements.

CPSC is given authority either to accredit laboratories (“third party conformity assessment bodies”) for doing the required testing of children’s products or to designate independent accrediting organizations to accredit the testing laboratories, with one exception. The Commission itself must accredit laboratories that are controlled by the manufacturer of the children’s product in question. To assure their impartiality, government labs must also meet strict standards of independence. The CPSC must maintain an up-to-date list of accredited labs on its web site. CPSC has authority to suspend or terminate a laboratory’s accreditation in appropriate circumstances.

The third-party testing and certification requirements for children’s products are phased in on a rolling schedule. The statute requires the CPSC to issue laboratory accreditation regimes for different categories of children’s products. Once the CPSC issues the laboratory accreditation requirement for that category of children’s products, each children’s product in that category that is manufactured more than ninety days after that date must be tested and certified to the applicable requirements. The schedule for CPSC to issue the laboratory accreditation requirements and the certification schedule is set forth on the timeline shown in the chart below.

  CPSC Publishes Accreditation Procedure Third Party Testing required
Lead Paint September 22, 2008* December 22, 2008
Cribs and Pacifiers October 2008 January 2009
Samll Parts November 2008 February 2009
Metal Jewelry December 2008 March 2009
Baby Bouncers, Walkers and Jumpers March 2009 June 2009
300 ppm Lead Content May 2009 August 2009
CPSC Children’s Product Safety Rules June 2009 September 2009

To find a recognized lab for the specific scope of inspection you are looking for please visit http://www.cpsc.gov/cgi-bin/labapplist.aspx, make sure that the lab is certified for your specific test requirements.  Not all labs are certified for all testing procedures.

Section 103 Tracking labels for children’s products

Section 103(a) of the new law requires manufacturers to have a tracking label or other distinguishing permanent mark on any consumer product primarily intended for children twelve and younger. The tracking label must contain certain basic information, including the source of the product, the date of manufacture and more detailed information on the manufacturing process such as a batch or run number. The scope of this provision is quite broad in that it applies to all children’s products, including, but not limited to, items such as clothing or shoes not just toys and other regulated products. Congress modified the requirement for tracking labels with the phrase “to the extent practicable” recognizing that it may not be practical for permanent distinguishing marks to be printed on small toys and other small products that are manufactured and shipped without individual packaging.

The Commission has the authority to issue a rule further defining the detail required in the tracking labels. Moreover, the Commission also has the ability to require in the future that the additional information contained on tracking labels for children’s products be expanded to cover all consumer products.

Section 103(c) of the new law also addresses the types of claims a manufacturer can make regarding its compliance with mandatory or voluntary safety rules. After October 12, 2008, no product packaging, advertisements or labels can refer to any safety standard unless the product complies with that standard.

Effective Date: The requirement for tracking labels is effective one year after the date of enactment or August 14, 2009. The requirements prohibiting advertising claims are effective 60 days after enactment or October 13, 2008.

Here is the Statement of Policy: Interpretation and Enforcement Of Section 103(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act

Which requirements apply?
Is your product a children’s article or furniture that bear paint or similar surface coating?
Is your product intended for under 36 months?
Is it a child care article for children under 4?
Durable nursery product for children under 5?
Is your product a toy?
Is it clothing or children’s sleepwear?
The paint limit standard under the CPSIA, Section 101 is 90 ppm and took effect on 8/14/09.   It applies the same to items as previsouly sold under the 600 ppm limit

  • Paint sold to consumers
  • Articles intended for children
  • Household furniture
  • Children’s products manufactured after 8/14/09 must be certified to the 90 ppm limit if they bear paint or similar surface coatings.

    “Small parts” ban for all items that are intended for children under 36 months of age.

    Small parts are “as received” or under “use and abuse” testing.  Basically you can have little parts when you open a package or if it is tested for example using a pull test or drop test, small parts can’t be the result from the test.
     Small parts are those fitting ht a small part cylinder (it is close to the size of a toilet paper roll, but a little smaller)

    Here is the regulatory summary for small parts regulations, toys and products intended for use by children under 3 years old

    Here is the regulatory summary for lead contain paint

    Here is the regulatory summary for children’s sleepwear

    Here is the regulatory summary for clothing textiles

    Other regulatory summaries can be found here

    Phthalates

    Section 108. Products Containing Certain Phthalates

    Good news!  Phthalate testing is for plasticized components only.  The limit is 1000 ppm for the 6 phthalates.

    There was brief mention of:

    Section 104. Standards and Consumer Registration of Durable Nursery Products

    and

    Section 106. Mandatory Toy Safety Standards

    Some questions included:

    When does a choke hazard warning need to be used?
    If you make an item for children under 3 years old, small parts are banned.  Toy or games for children 3 to 6 years old, but not all products, some craft products are not thought of as toys or games and thus a choke warning is not needed.

    Tracking labels, what does ascertain mean? 
    Ascertain means information about the product doesn’t’t need it to be on the product as long as the consumer has the ability to get to the information 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.  No phone numbers unless that phone is manned 24 hours a day.  A web solution is the best choice if you don’t want to put this information on your product.

    Children’s jewelry, is it the same definition as California? And are hair accessories considered jewelry? 
    Hair accessories are not considered jewelry by the CPSC, the they are considered accessories by California.

    Screen printing?  There is not just one type of screen printing.  The key to regulation is to the process and if that process creates a surface coating? 
    If that process creates a surface coating than that would require a lead test.  Many if not most create a coating and subject to the 90 ppm lead limit.  If the process/ink/dye sinks in to the fabric than you are subject to the 300 ppm limit.  If you have dye, you can do determinations and take advantage of these rules and say a dye is ok.  You must be confident and knowledgeable about the products.

    This was just some highlights from today’s webinar.  The CPSC will be posting a link to the video, when they make it available, I will post a link to it here.

    If you have any questions, please contact us at info@essco-safetycheck.com

    Share

    Essco Safety Check

    Promote Your Page Too

    March 24, 2010

    The HTA and CPSC will talk about the CPSIA and Small Businesses via a webinar this Friday

    Filed under: Events, News — Tags: , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 1:28 pm

    This Friday, March 26th at 11:00 a.m. EDT Senior officials from the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and members of the Handmade Toy Alliance  will talk about how the CPSIA has impacted small businesses. Jay Howell and Gib Mullan will represent the CPSC.

    This is an opportunity for small business owners to get answers to questions both specific and general about how the CPSIA affects your business.

    Please send questions to HTAquestions@cpsc.gov before, during and after the webinar.

    The webinar will begin with presentations by both officials from the CPSC and that will be followed with a question and answer session.

    Essco Safety Check will participate in the webinar and our ultimate goal is to help simulate businesses, creating jobs and improving lives by utilizing X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers.

    Please visit the Handmade Toy Alliance blog about this webinar or to participate in this webinar visit: www.cpsc.gov/webcast/index.html

    ***(The CPSC email address for questions will be active for only a month after the webinar to follow up on questions.)

    Share

    Powered by WordPress