Know what is in your environment

December 15, 2010

Essco Safety Check is providing free toy testing to Hopelink of Redmond, WA

Essco Safety Check has begun an annual tradition of giving back during the holiday season by providing FREE Holiday Toy Testing for Hopelink of Redmond. 

Essco Safety Check is donating our XRF Testing Services to Hopelink of Redmond by providing toy testing this holiday season.  We will be testing some of the toys they will be giving away (similar to Toys for Tots) for lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, antimony and other potentially harmful metals.  We simply wish to help out this holiday season by ensuring that the toys Hopelink of Redmond is giving away to children do not contain any potentially harmful metals.

Hopelink serves the homeless and low income families, children, seniors and people with disabilities. 

Hopelink is a non-profit corporation with 92% of all financial support going directly to help families in crises and preventing homelessness.

If you would like to donate to Hopelink, please visit http://www.hope-link.org/takeaction/volunteer

Share


Essco Safety Check

September 19, 2010

XRF testing helps find mercury in facial creams

Have you ever wondered if your favorite coffee cup, you know the one you drink out of every day, has any lead in it?    Are you curious if the toys your children are playing with have any potentially harmful heavy metals like lead or cadmium?  What about the facial or topical creams you apply to your body? Do you ever stop and think what is in your environment and how your environment may affect your health or life?

Three years ago I started a business, Environmental Services & Solutions Corporation (otherwise known as Essco Safety Check) to provide X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) testing services to moms and dads, to help them know what was in their environment.  XRF analyzers use X-Rays to non-destructively detect heavy metals in virtually anything.  Our handheld XRF analyzers, from Olympus Innov-X, are essentially a hand-held mass spectrometer capable of detecting elements from 15 to 94 on the periodic chart. 

Since 2007, when Essco Safety Check started, we have added testing services that help businesses, industries and government, as well as, developing a sophisticated software platform to collect and analyze environmental data in a cloud-based system.  We have been specifically involved with consumer product testing helping businesses affected by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) and contractors, painters, remodelers, home inspector and homeowners affected by the Renovation, Repair & Painting (RRP) Rule, among many other types of XRF testing.

Essco Safety Check has been involved with several national recalls for lead and cadmium and has had many discussions with the CPSC, FDA, EPA, state and local agencies about different environmental issues.  Our testing has found lead and cadmium in toys, ceramics, jewelry, painted surfaces, metal objects, cookware, medical products and more.  We have provided testimony at state hearings, have worked with advocacy groups, provided community testing events and have been on hundreds of job sites.  With all of this experience using XRF analyzers, you would have thought I would have learned never to be surprised what you may find.   Yet, you may be wrong…I may not always be surprised what I find, I may be disgusted.

Recently, Essco Safety Check was contacted to help provide XRF testing of facial creams from Southeast Asia to look for mercury.  My initial concern with this project was that we would not find mercury because levels of mercury would be below our detection capabilities.  The XRF analyzers that we use have detection limitations in the parts per million (PPM) and I suspected that the levels of mercury in the facial creams would be in the parts per billion (PPB).  I was informed that the levels of mercury in some of the suspected facial creams with mercury were greater than one percent. 

1 % = 10,000 (PPM)

After several discussions with the parties involved, samples of six different facial creams (skin whitening creams) were sent to Essco Safety Check’s office.  Testing proceeded and you know what?

I was disgusted. 

In three of the samples that were tested, levels of mercury were detectible, greater than 600 PPM.  Two of the samples were found to contain more than 8,000 PPM and one sample was found to contain over 15,000 PPM or 1.5% mercury.  This is a product that is applied to the face and it has high levels of mercury.

Mercury is banned in skin-bleaching or lightening products, such a product would have words listed on the packaging as “lightening” or “whitening”, if these words are not listed, it is considered a cosmetic.   Eye area cosmetics are permitted to have concentrations of mercury not exceeding 65 PPM if it is used as a preservative, and only if no other preservative is available for use.  All other cosmetics are only permitted trace amounts of mercury, less than 1 PPM.

Essco Safety Check was initially contacted to help determine if certain facial creams had levels of mercury, because people who were using these creams appear to be suffering from mercury poisoning.  Some symptoms of mercury poisoning are; metallic taste, vomiting, difficulty breathing, bad cough, swollen or bleeding gums and if enough mercury is ingested in your blood stream, kidney and brain damage may occur.  Often with modest exposure, there is no oblivious effect.  However, in one extreme recent case in Cambodia a young lady died apparently from a hypersensitive response to mercury in a skin whitener, identified as Bao Dam from Vietnam [1].  The creams Essco Safety Check evaluated were apparently from Vietnam, Thailand and China but they may have been bootlegged and produced anywhere.  Mercury is readily absorbed through the skin in a topical application and mercury can accumulate in the body.

In May of this year, the Chicago Tribune did an investigation of 50 skin-lightening creams by purchasing these facial creams in Chicago stores.  Five of the creams were found to contain amounts mercury greater than 6,000 PPM.   They are:

  • Crème Diana C.T.R. – manufactured in Lebanon – 6,900 PPM
  • Ling Ji Su containers – manufactured in China – 6,530 PPM (white cream); 6,090 PPM (yellow cream)
  • Lulanjina – manufactured in China – 14,700 PPM (yellow cream); 14,100 PPM (white cream)
  • Stillman’s Skin Bleach Cream – manufactured in Pakistan – 29,600 PPM
  • Top-Gel MCA Extra Pearl Cream – manufactured in Taiwan – 7,030 PPM
  • The FDA did respond to this investigation.

    This is just another example of why you would want to know what is in your environment.  XRF testing helps people and businesses know what is in their environment.   We have the potential to help governments with limited regulations learn about product safety and help create regulations that will protect citizens, workers and the environment, while saving time and money.  XRF testing can create jobs and improve people’s lives.

    Know what is in your environment and mitigate harm.

    [1] http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/34119/skin-cream-linked-to-bride-death

    Share


    Essco Safety Check

    July 8, 2010

    Free community testing for lead, cadmium and other heavy metals

    Community Testing

    Join us at Redmond Derby Days / IMPACT-Eco event this Saturday, July 10th, 2010 from 10:00AM to 6:00PM for FREE Consumer Product Testing.  Essco Safety Check will be providing FREE X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Testing for heavy metals; lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, antimony and more. 

    Bring your toys, ceramics, jewelry, favorite coffee cup, baby products, paint chip samples, yellow bumbo seats or anything you would like to have tested for heavy metals.   All testing is non-destructive and takes a few seconds to perform.

    Please visit our booth this Saturday, July 10th, 2010 from 10:00 AM to 6:00PM for FREE Consumer Product Testing, to ask us any questions about heavy metals in your environment, to pickup special offers or simply learn more about Essco Safety Check.

    The Eco-Fair will feature:

  • Free Consumer Product Testing by Essco Safety Check
  • A Green Car Show
  • Solar Powered Sage
  • A green business showcase, discount and resources for going green
  • Fun items for kids
  • A root beer garden and more!
  • Stay late for a fireworks spectacle at Redmond City Hall Campus at 10:00 PM

    For more information about Redmond Derby Days and IMPACT / Eco-Fair, please visit

    We look forward to seeing you this Saturday.

    If you are unable to stop by this Saturday we will be participating in another community event in August at WA Autism Day at the Jubilee Farm in Carnation on August 7th from 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM and providing free testing for all participants.

    Know what is in your environment!

    Share

    Essco Safety Check

    July 5, 2010

    Free XRF testing provided by Essco Safety Check Saturday, July 10th, 2010

    Essco Safety Check will be participating in Redmond Derby Days and Impact Eco-Fair on July 10th, 2010 from 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM by providing FREE X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) testing for heavy metals. The Eco-Fair will be located at Redmond City Hall Campus 8703 160th Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052.

    The Eco-Fair will feature:

  • Free Consumer Product Testing by Essco Safety Check
  • A Green Car Show
  • Solar Powered Sage
  • A green business showcase, discount and resources for going green
  • Fun items for kids
  • A root beer garden and more!
  • Stay late for a fireworks spectacle at Redmond City Hall Campus at 10:00 PM

    If you would like to have any consumer products tested for heavy metals (lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, antimony or other heavy metals) please visit our booth between 10:00 AM and 6:00 PM on Saturday, July 10th, 2010. Bring you toys, ceramics, jewelry, paint chip samples, yellow bumbo seats or anything you would like tested, we will be on hand to provide free testing and answer any questions you may have.

    All testing is non-destructive and takes a few seconds to perform. For more information about Redmond Derby Days and Impact Eco-Fair, please visit or for more information at Essco Safety Check please visit.

    We look forward to seeing you this Saturday.

    If you are unable to stop by this Saturday we will be participating in another community event in August at WA Autism Day at the Jubilee Farm in Carnation on August 7th from 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM and providing free testing for all participants.

    Know what is in your environment!

    Share

    Essco Safety Check

    June 4, 2010

    McDonald’s is recalling “Shrek Forever After” glassware

    Filed under: Health, News, Regulation — Tags: , , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 8:22 am

    12 Million "Shrek" glasses recalled by McDonald's

    Cadmium was found in the paint of glasses sold at McDonald’s.  12 Million Drinking glasses that feature characters from the movie “Shrek Forever After” are being voluntarily recalled by McDonald’s in collaboration with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).

    The 16-ounce glasses were sold at McDonald’s restaurants for $2, beginning on May 21st, 2010.  The four designs include Puss n’ Boots, Shrek, Princess Fiona and Donkey and were manufactured by ARC International, based in Millville, N.J.

    No injuries have been reported and, “The glasses have far less cadmium than the children’s metal jewelry that CPSC has previously recalled,” said a spokesperson for the CPSC.

    Customers cag get instructions to return the glassware and request a refund by visiting www.mcdonalds.com/glasses beginning June 8th or call 1-800-244-6227.

    This marks the fifth recall for cadmium issued by the CPSC this year.  Prior to this year, no recall has ever been issued for cadmium.  Essco Safety Check is continuing to work with CPSC and FDA on issues involving heavy metals in consumer products.

    Do you “know what is in your environment?”

    Share

    Essco Safety Check

    May 28, 2010

    Lead legally permitted in toothbrushes and other “consumer” products

    Filed under: Health, News, Regulation — Tags: , , , , , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 10:22 am

    Over 1000ppm of lead found in yellow colored bristles of a toothbrush.  This product is not in violation of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) which regulates lead in children’s products.

    Do you know what a consumer product is?

    Unfortunately, toothbrushes and other patented early intervention dental products which are designed or intended for children 12 years of age or younger are in fact, not “consumer products.”  Because these products are not “consumer products,” they do not fall within the definition of children’s products that require third-party testing. Thus the lead limits in the CPSIA do not apply to this product. 

    This product is regulated by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and currently there are no specifications for levels of heavy metals in dental devices.

    There are many products consumers would consider a “consumer product” which are in fact not “consumer products” and not regulated as a consumer product.  Many products fall into exemptions including; toothbrushes, toothpicks, dental floss, flatware (knives, forks, spoons, baby spoons, serving utensils, etc.), ceramics (plates, cups, bowls, etc), cutting boards, bulb syringes, surgical tubing and more. 

    Each of these products can be directly used by children and pregnant women, yet none have to be tested for the regulation standards of a children’s product, which means they can contain more than 300ppm of lead legally.

    Essco Safety Check is an environmental technology and software integration company; utilizing X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzers (among other data collection devices) and a proprietary software platform to collect and analyze environmental data.  Essco Safety Check is now coordinating with both the CPSC & FDA on this issue.

    Share

    Essco Safety Check

    May 24, 2010

    Do you know what a consumer product is? (Part 1)

    Typical household consumables

    Most people would think that the “products” you and your children use every day in your daily routine are “consumer products”, you know the things we cook, eat and drink with.  Most people would think that “products” put in your mouth, given to us or used on us by a hospital while we are patients, are tested for lead and other harmful chemicals.  Most people would think that the regulating agencies are fully protecting us and inspecting all “products.”  Most people would be wrong!

    A “consumer product” is regulated by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and their definition of a consumer product is:

    any article, or component part thereof, produced or distributed (i) for sale to a consumer for use in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation, or otherwise, or (ii) for the personal use, consumption or enjoyment of a consumer in or around a permanent or temporary household or residence, a school, in recreation, or otherwise;

    There are some exemptions that we will get to in a moment. 

    According to the CPSC, they are “charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of serious injury or death from thousands of consumer products and they are committed to protecting consumers and families from products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard or can injure children.”  Essentially, the CPSC is working to ensure the safety of consumer products from harming the public.

    Why are some “products” that consumer’s use on a regular basis not considered “consumer products”?  Why are these “products” not regulated or tested for heavy metals and chemicals as a children’s product would be?  Why are these “products” regulated by different governmental agencies?  And why do those agencies have different ways of testing and regulating for lead? 

    Simply put, why do we permit lead and other harmful elements and chemicals into our “consumer” and “non-consumer products”? 

    Why does the FDA, which regulates all food surface contact points, have a different testing regulation for lead than a child’s product?  Doesn’t a child eat off of a typical dinner plate, and drink hot chocolate out of a standard coffee cup?  Why is a product that we all put into our mouth, not tested for lead?

    Because these “products” are not considered “consumer products” and ultimately not “children’s products” which means that they are not required to be tested for lead or phthalates.  You may want to ask your legislator!

    Here are a few examples of items that you may think are “consumer products” but in fact are not considered “consumer products” and thus not regulated by the CPSC.  These “products” can all be used by children, all have a potential for direct epidermal contact or direct ingestion potential. In each case, these products are regulated by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and some have regulations for lead and others do not, but none are regulated for “total content” of lead and thus are all permitted to have more than 300ppm of lead (the legal amount of lead in a toy “children’s product”).

    1. Toothbrushes
    2. Toothpicks
    3. Dental Floss
    4. Band Aides
    5. Bulb Syringes
    6. Surgical Tubing
    7. Flatware (Knives, forks, baby spoons, serving utensils, etc…)
    8. Ceramics (plates, cups, bowls, etc)
    9. Cutting boards
    10. Pots, pans and other cooking utensils.

    There whole crux of this is that there is no real definition of a “consumer product.”  Most people would think that a toothbrush is a consumer product and since children use toothbrushes, they would be inspected for lead.  Most people would be wrong!

    Toothbrushes and other patented early intervention dental products which are designed or intended for children 12 years of age or younger are in fact, not “consumer products” and because these products are not “consumer products” they do not fall within the definition of children’s products that require third-party testing.  Thus the lead limits in the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) do not apply to this product. 

    Have you considered what is in your plates, dishes or your coffee cups?  Do you know that FDA regulates the food contact surface of a coffee cup and the CPSC regulates the exterior, non-food contact surface?

    How is this protecting the public?  

    Environmental Services & Solutions Corporation (Essco Safety Check) is here to help bring awareness and share information about environmental concerns.  Feel free to visit our website for more information www.essco-safetycheck.com 

    Keep you eyes out for “Part 2″ of this story, more specific information on State and Federal regulations.

    Share

    Essco Safety Check

    April 27, 2010

    Small environmental testing company impacts one of the world’s largest businesses, Wal-Mart.

    For almost three years, Environmental Services & Solutions Corporation (Essco – Safety Check) has been providing elemental testing services to moms & dads, homeowners, businesses and industries, to help them “know what is in their environment.”   We have performed tens of thousands of tests and have collected extensive data about consumer products and the elements that are present in them.   We are a small company trying to help people and businesses, improving lives and create jobs all with the use of X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers and a proprietary software suite to collect and analyze data.

    In October 2009, Essco Safety Check participated in the Northwest Children’s Environmental Health Forum by presenting data on heavy metals found in children’s products.  This data was analyzed for specific elements (cadmium and lead) and then the results were shared with Associated Press reporter Justin Pritchard over November and December of 2009.  Here is a link to our typical findings from an in-home inspection.

    On January 10th, 2010, Justin Pritchard wrote an article “AP: Feds probe cadmium in kids’ jewelry from China.”  Apparently, the Associated Press conducted their own independent testing (based on initial data supplied from Essco Safety Check and HealthyStuff.org) of children’s jewelry purchased in New York, Ohio, Texas and California.  Their testing was conducted by chemistry professor Jeff Weidenhamer of Ashland University of Ohio, who has worked with the CPSC in the past. The results found cadmium in children’s jewelry at a level of 100,000 PPM (10%) or greater in 12 percent of the 103 items tested. 

    Children's jewelry recalled for cadmium 1/29/10

    Children's jewelry recalled for cadmium 1/29/10

    On January 29th, 2010, the US Consumer Product Safety Commission announced a voluntary recall of children’s metal necklaces because of high levels of cadmium.  In corporation with F.A.F. of Greenville, R.I. about 55,000 units were recalled. The products recalled are shaped as a frog pendant or metal crown on a metal chain necklace.  The model #’s are 4616-4187 & 4616-4190 with UPC #’s 72783367144 & 72783367147.  These items were sold exclusively at Wal-Mart Stores nationwide from November 2009 to January 2010 for approximately $5.
    Yesterday, April 26th, 2010 Wal-Mart issued a statement on cadmium and new testing standards that all Wal-Mart suppliers will have to comply with.  These standards are more stringent than the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), and all toys, child care articles, children’s costume jewelry and children’s jewelry craft making kits tested on or after April 9th, 2010 are now required to meet Wal-Mart’s new voluntary standards.

    The new testing standards will be modeled similarly to the European Union, EN 71-3:1995 “Safety of toys – Part 3: Migration of Certain Elements” but will not affect what is currently on the store shelves.

    In short, this means that the world’s largest retailer, Wal-Mart, is now imposing new testing standards to help protect consumers from cadmium; this is a very good thing.  These new standards are taking affect immediately and will help prevent toxic toys, jewelry and other children’s products from reaching the marketplace.  There is a feeling of “wow and awe” that a small environmental testing company (Essco Safety Check) who shared data about children’s products and the heavy metals we found in them, can impact the largest retailer in the world.  The data shared lead to an investigation by the Associated Press and now, today, Wal-Mart has issued new testing standards that all suppliers must meet.

    Do you know what is in your environment?  Know what is in your environment and mitigate harm.

    Share

    Essco Safety Check

    April 20, 2010

    Run, play and take the lead home with you

    Filed under: Health, News, Regulation — Tags: , , , , , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 8:52 am

    Spring is here and the parks are full of families with children, soccer games being played, and people enjoying the sunshine.  Would you suspect that running or playing on a field can be potentially harmful to you or your children and pets? 

    I’m a creature of the sunshine and when I get an opportunity to go to the park, I tend to go.  Last week I went to a local park and tossed the football around with a friend on a field made of field turf. 

    When I got home from playing at the park and took off my shoes, I found a bunch of small black pellets in the bottom of my shoes and on my socks.  I was curious as to what they were made of, especially since I brought them home to my personal environment. 

    I happen to own an environmental technology company (Essco Safety Check) that utilizes X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers to help people and businesses know what is in their environment.  XRF analyzers are a non-destructive testing source that can identify certain elements; we use them primarily to detect heavy metals in consumer products, housing, soil, but virtually anything can be tested. 

    I decided to test the black pellets that I brought home with me to find out what they are made of.  The results showed that approximately 180 parts per million (ppm) of lead are present in these black pellets.

    The amount of lead found in the black pellets is below the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) which regulates consumer products designed for children and has a limit standard of 300ppm of lead.  The Washington State soil action level is at 400ppm, so in each case, the level of lead is below either regulation.  However, lead is present and after playing on this field, I took the lead home with me.

    Artificial field turf consist of plastic fibers and typically include an “in-fill” material which is commonly made of rubber pellets, made from recycled automobile tires, known as “crumb rubber.”

    What about children playing on that field?  What about dogs playing Frisbee?  What about bringing these pellets to your home environment?  What about when it rains and the water runoff?  I had many questions about these findings and decided a little more field work and research was needed.

    I went back to the field to collect more samples of the black pellets, and a soil sample from near the field.  I planned on running around the field turf for some exercise, primarily to collect samples.  I walked to the corner of the field, where a corner kick would take place from and tossed my knapsack down.  I was just about ready to run when I noticed that the white painted area of the corner kick section was dotted with black specks.  I got down on my hands and knees and realized those black specks were “crumb rubber”.

    Collecting samples was as easy as wiping the surface of the field, but simply placing my hand or knee on the field surface, black pellets stuck to my skin.  I collected my samples of black pellets, grabbed a soil sample from an open patch of soil under a tree (I’ve seen families eat lunch there) and went back to my office to analyze the samples and contact city and state officials.

    The amount of lead found in the second sample of “crumb rubber” matched the first test results of 180ppm.  In addition to lead, zinc was also found at a level of 11% or 110000ppm.  The potential problem with zinc is potential water contamination from leaching or runoff.  The fact that zinc and lead are found does not mean that they will cause harm, but since they are present, there is a potential for harm.

    To be honest, field turf offers some benefits to the user and environment.  These fields offer all-weather playability, which results in longer playing hours.  There is reduced maintenance, including hours worked, reduced water consumption, herbicides, pesticides and equipment used.

    Unfortunately, there are some environmental concerns, specifically about potential toxicants.  Using recycled tires, “crumb rubber” as in-fill, can create some concerns, especially about the chemical composition and exposure, which can potentially harm the field users, especially children and pets.  Tires are known to contain toxic and potentially carcinogenic compounds including, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), phthalates, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), heavy metals (lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, nickel, iron, zinc, manganese) and more.

    I unfortunately do not know the chemical composition of the “crumb rubber” I tested, but lead and zinc are positively present.  I additionally found levels of bromine, which can be of some concern to particular health and regulatory officials (depending on location).

    The field turf that was originally tested and found with lead had two sister fields at this park.  Testing of these sister fields showed levels of lead in the “crumb rubber” to be between 20-30ppm and the zinc levels higher in both additional fields.    These additional fields were installed more recently than the original field tested and reported with 180ppm of lead.  The soil sample collected was not found with any detectable amounts of lead (the XRF analyzer used has a lower limit standard of 10ppm for lead).

    What does all of this mean?  A synthetic field has more lead than the soil around it and that lead is easily transportable to your personal environment.

    If i went on vacation to this park, my shirt should read:  I went to this beautiful park to run and play, and all I got was lead in my shoes.

    Do you know what is in your environment?

    Know what is in your environment and mitigate harm.

    Share

    April 12, 2010

    Star Wars figurines found with cadmium and lead, say it isn’t so Yoda!

    Say it isn't so Yoda!  Cadmium and Lead found in Star Wars Figurines

    Say it isn't so Yoda! Cadmium and Lead found in Star Wars Figurines

    Owning an environmental testing company, I am fairly numb as to where I find certain heavy metals like lead.  However, today I must say I’m saddened to find lead and cadmium in toys I use to play with as a child and know that many of these toys are still around today, in homes with children.

    Over the weekend, I was contacted by a concerned mother of two beautiful boys; she wanted to make sure that the toys and items they would play with are free from environmental toxicants.   This morning she visited our office (Essco Safety Check) to have me test some items from lead using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers, however, I found more than just lead, I found cadmium too.

    The problem with today’s test is much like every other day, the randomness as to where I find, what I find.  Why does one figurine have lead or cadmium and another doesn’t?  It could be the coloring agents, or it could be involved in the making of plastic, or just a random element mixed in to the item during production.  But regardless, it is present and was found in some fairly high quantities.  

    Today I tested approximately 30 Star Wars figurines and found approximately half to contain lead or cadmium.  You should note that these Star Wars figurines I tested and found with lead or cadmium are from 1977, 1979 & 1980 (marked on each figurine), they are fairly old and were manufactured before particular regulations regarding lead.  But regardless of when they were manufactured, some of these figurines contain harmful heavy metals, making them toxic toys.

    Yoda contains approximately 1,800 PPM of cadmium, along with a Luke Skywalker figurine and Boba Fet figurine, while Lando Calrissian appears to have over 1% lead (over 10,000 PPM) in his vinyl cape.  Many other figurines had levels of cadmium ranging from 250 PPM to over 600 PPM. 

    What does all of this mean?  You should be aware that your children could have “hand-me-down” toys that could be considered toxic toys. 

    Have you given your children toys from your childhood to play with?

    Share

    Older Posts »

    Powered by WordPress