Know what is in your environment

April 30, 2010

The Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection held a hearing about the “Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act” on Thursday, April 29, 2010.

Thursday, April 29th beginning at 10am, the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection held a hearing to discuss the Consumer Product Safety Enhancement Act (CPSEA) and the impacts of this pending regulation on the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA)

Witnesses included:

•Rosario Palmieri, Vice President for Infrastructure, Legal, and Regulatory Policy, National Association of Manufacturers
•Paul Vitrano, General Counsel, Motorcycle Industry Council
•Jim Gibbons, President and Chief Executive Officer, Goodwill Industries International
•Dan Marshall, Handmade Toy Alliance
•Rachel Weintraub, Director of Product Safety and Senior Counsel, Consumer Federation of America
•Steve Levy, American Apparel and Footwear Association
•Rick Woldenberg, Chairman, Learning Resources, Inc.

The CPSEA is a bill that would provide exceptions to lead and phthalate prohibitions and regulatory relief for thrift stores, small manufacturers, and other businesses.  

The legislation seeks to resolve some of the concerns raised by various interested parties by addressing unforeseen impacts of CPSIA. To this end, the legislation provides three major forms of relief:

• New regulatory flexibility for CPSC to exempt certain products, components, and materials from the lead limits in CPSIA, with limitations to ensure protection of public health;

• Relief for thrift stores and other retailers through an exclusion for certain used children’s products from the lead limits, and a modification of the lead limit, set to take effect in August 2011, so that it will apply only to newly manufactured products;

• Relief for small batch manufacturers and other businesses by allowing the commission to approve alternative testing requirements for certain small batch manufacturers, by requiring CPSC outreach and assistance to small businesses, and by providing that the law’s phthalate limits shall not apply to inaccessible component parts.

The legislation also provides for a narrow set of improved and clarified authorities to allow the CPSC to carry out the law.

You can read the Committee Print of the CPSEA here.

You can review the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection hearing of the CPSEA held on Thursday, April 29th, 2010 here

Witnesses answered questions for almost two-hours, including testimony from Dan Marshall.  Dan spoke eloquently about the needed use of alternative testing methods, specifically X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers.  Dan also submitted an economic impact analysis that I (Seth Goldberg, President, Essco Safety Check) wrote back on January 22, 2010 entitled “the potential economic impact of the CPSIA” and the Handmade Toy Alliance (HTA) reposted this blog on February 11, 2010 “Allowing XRF testing for CPSIA compliance could save $3.7 Billion and save small businesses.”

If anyone has any question about this analysis that I wrote, please feel free to ask me questions.

Share

Essco Safety Check

April 27, 2010

Small environmental testing company impacts one of the world’s largest businesses, Wal-Mart.

For almost three years, Environmental Services & Solutions Corporation (Essco – Safety Check) has been providing elemental testing services to moms & dads, homeowners, businesses and industries, to help them “know what is in their environment.”   We have performed tens of thousands of tests and have collected extensive data about consumer products and the elements that are present in them.   We are a small company trying to help people and businesses, improving lives and create jobs all with the use of X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers and a proprietary software suite to collect and analyze data.

In October 2009, Essco Safety Check participated in the Northwest Children’s Environmental Health Forum by presenting data on heavy metals found in children’s products.  This data was analyzed for specific elements (cadmium and lead) and then the results were shared with Associated Press reporter Justin Pritchard over November and December of 2009.  Here is a link to our typical findings from an in-home inspection.

On January 10th, 2010, Justin Pritchard wrote an article “AP: Feds probe cadmium in kids’ jewelry from China.”  Apparently, the Associated Press conducted their own independent testing (based on initial data supplied from Essco Safety Check and HealthyStuff.org) of children’s jewelry purchased in New York, Ohio, Texas and California.  Their testing was conducted by chemistry professor Jeff Weidenhamer of Ashland University of Ohio, who has worked with the CPSC in the past. The results found cadmium in children’s jewelry at a level of 100,000 PPM (10%) or greater in 12 percent of the 103 items tested. 

Children's jewelry recalled for cadmium 1/29/10

Children's jewelry recalled for cadmium 1/29/10

On January 29th, 2010, the US Consumer Product Safety Commission announced a voluntary recall of children’s metal necklaces because of high levels of cadmium.  In corporation with F.A.F. of Greenville, R.I. about 55,000 units were recalled. The products recalled are shaped as a frog pendant or metal crown on a metal chain necklace.  The model #’s are 4616-4187 & 4616-4190 with UPC #’s 72783367144 & 72783367147.  These items were sold exclusively at Wal-Mart Stores nationwide from November 2009 to January 2010 for approximately $5.
Yesterday, April 26th, 2010 Wal-Mart issued a statement on cadmium and new testing standards that all Wal-Mart suppliers will have to comply with.  These standards are more stringent than the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), and all toys, child care articles, children’s costume jewelry and children’s jewelry craft making kits tested on or after April 9th, 2010 are now required to meet Wal-Mart’s new voluntary standards.

The new testing standards will be modeled similarly to the European Union, EN 71-3:1995 “Safety of toys – Part 3: Migration of Certain Elements” but will not affect what is currently on the store shelves.

In short, this means that the world’s largest retailer, Wal-Mart, is now imposing new testing standards to help protect consumers from cadmium; this is a very good thing.  These new standards are taking affect immediately and will help prevent toxic toys, jewelry and other children’s products from reaching the marketplace.  There is a feeling of “wow and awe” that a small environmental testing company (Essco Safety Check) who shared data about children’s products and the heavy metals we found in them, can impact the largest retailer in the world.  The data shared lead to an investigation by the Associated Press and now, today, Wal-Mart has issued new testing standards that all suppliers must meet.

Do you know what is in your environment?  Know what is in your environment and mitigate harm.

Share

Essco Safety Check

April 20, 2010

Run, play and take the lead home with you

Filed under: Health, News, Regulation — Tags: , , , , , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 8:52 am

Spring is here and the parks are full of families with children, soccer games being played, and people enjoying the sunshine.  Would you suspect that running or playing on a field can be potentially harmful to you or your children and pets? 

I’m a creature of the sunshine and when I get an opportunity to go to the park, I tend to go.  Last week I went to a local park and tossed the football around with a friend on a field made of field turf. 

When I got home from playing at the park and took off my shoes, I found a bunch of small black pellets in the bottom of my shoes and on my socks.  I was curious as to what they were made of, especially since I brought them home to my personal environment. 

I happen to own an environmental technology company (Essco Safety Check) that utilizes X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers to help people and businesses know what is in their environment.  XRF analyzers are a non-destructive testing source that can identify certain elements; we use them primarily to detect heavy metals in consumer products, housing, soil, but virtually anything can be tested. 

I decided to test the black pellets that I brought home with me to find out what they are made of.  The results showed that approximately 180 parts per million (ppm) of lead are present in these black pellets.

The amount of lead found in the black pellets is below the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) which regulates consumer products designed for children and has a limit standard of 300ppm of lead.  The Washington State soil action level is at 400ppm, so in each case, the level of lead is below either regulation.  However, lead is present and after playing on this field, I took the lead home with me.

Artificial field turf consist of plastic fibers and typically include an “in-fill” material which is commonly made of rubber pellets, made from recycled automobile tires, known as “crumb rubber.”

What about children playing on that field?  What about dogs playing Frisbee?  What about bringing these pellets to your home environment?  What about when it rains and the water runoff?  I had many questions about these findings and decided a little more field work and research was needed.

I went back to the field to collect more samples of the black pellets, and a soil sample from near the field.  I planned on running around the field turf for some exercise, primarily to collect samples.  I walked to the corner of the field, where a corner kick would take place from and tossed my knapsack down.  I was just about ready to run when I noticed that the white painted area of the corner kick section was dotted with black specks.  I got down on my hands and knees and realized those black specks were “crumb rubber”.

Collecting samples was as easy as wiping the surface of the field, but simply placing my hand or knee on the field surface, black pellets stuck to my skin.  I collected my samples of black pellets, grabbed a soil sample from an open patch of soil under a tree (I’ve seen families eat lunch there) and went back to my office to analyze the samples and contact city and state officials.

The amount of lead found in the second sample of “crumb rubber” matched the first test results of 180ppm.  In addition to lead, zinc was also found at a level of 11% or 110000ppm.  The potential problem with zinc is potential water contamination from leaching or runoff.  The fact that zinc and lead are found does not mean that they will cause harm, but since they are present, there is a potential for harm.

To be honest, field turf offers some benefits to the user and environment.  These fields offer all-weather playability, which results in longer playing hours.  There is reduced maintenance, including hours worked, reduced water consumption, herbicides, pesticides and equipment used.

Unfortunately, there are some environmental concerns, specifically about potential toxicants.  Using recycled tires, “crumb rubber” as in-fill, can create some concerns, especially about the chemical composition and exposure, which can potentially harm the field users, especially children and pets.  Tires are known to contain toxic and potentially carcinogenic compounds including, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), phthalates, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), heavy metals (lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, nickel, iron, zinc, manganese) and more.

I unfortunately do not know the chemical composition of the “crumb rubber” I tested, but lead and zinc are positively present.  I additionally found levels of bromine, which can be of some concern to particular health and regulatory officials (depending on location).

The field turf that was originally tested and found with lead had two sister fields at this park.  Testing of these sister fields showed levels of lead in the “crumb rubber” to be between 20-30ppm and the zinc levels higher in both additional fields.    These additional fields were installed more recently than the original field tested and reported with 180ppm of lead.  The soil sample collected was not found with any detectable amounts of lead (the XRF analyzer used has a lower limit standard of 10ppm for lead).

What does all of this mean?  A synthetic field has more lead than the soil around it and that lead is easily transportable to your personal environment.

If i went on vacation to this park, my shirt should read:  I went to this beautiful park to run and play, and all I got was lead in my shoes.

Do you know what is in your environment?

Know what is in your environment and mitigate harm.

Share

April 16, 2010

Warning for homeowners, child care facility operators and school’s built before 1978.

Filed under: News, Regulation, viewpoint — Tags: , , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 8:57 am

Beginning April 22nd, 2010 a new federal law (Renovation, Repair, and Painting – RRP) established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will require any contractor that disturbs lead-based paint in homes, child care facilities or schools, built before 1978 to be certified and follow specific work practices to prevent lead contamination. 

You, as a homeowner, child care facility operator, school administrator or a contractor, need to ask a few questions to see if the new rules will apply. 

Are you going to do any remodeling, repair or painting on a property (home, child care facility or school) that was built before 1978?  If so, the contractor performing the work must be certified and follow specific work practices to prevent lead contamination.

Common remodeling, repair or painting activities such as sanding, cutting and demolition can create hazardous lead dust and chips by disturbing lead-based paint.  Lead is most commonly ingested by dust, but can also be found in soil, your water or household items (toys, ceramics, jewelry, etc)

Lead is a harmful toxicant that can be especially dangerous to children under six.  It can affect the central nervous system and affect the development of children’s brains.  It can reduce IQ scores and cause learning disabilities and behavioral problems.

According to the EPA 24% of homes that are built from 1960 – 1978 contain lead based paint, 69 % of homes built from 1940 – 1960 contain lead-based paint and 87% of homes built before 1940 contain lead-based paint.  The EPA estimates that 37.8 million pre-1978 housing units and child-occupied facilities are still in use today.

If you are going to do or have any remodeling, repair of painting on a pre-1978 property than you have a few options. 

1.)  You can assume that your home, child care facility, or school contains lead and thus follow lead safe work practices.
2.) You or your contractor can test for lead using an EPA-approved testing kit, typically available at hardware stores.
3.)  You can hire a certified professional (certified lead inspector or risk assessor) to determine if your property has lead or lead hazards.

Regardless of the age of the home, contractors should; contain the work area, minimize dust and cleanup thoroughly.  The RRP Rule is simply designed to assure that workers, homeowners and children are protected from the harmful effects of lead.

There are some exclusions and an opt-out provision to the RRP Rule, they include:

1.) Renovations that affect only components that have been determined to be free of lead-based paint.
2.) Activities that disturbs fewer than 6 square feet interior or 20 square feet exterior.  This excludes window replacement, demolition and projects involving prohibited practices
3.) Work done by individuals in housing they own and occupy.

The Opt-out provision is:
1.) Homeowners may opt out of the rule requirements if:
 a.) They occupy the housing to be renovated,
 b.) The housing is not a child-occupied facility, and
 c.) No child under age 6 or pregnant woman resides there

Homeowners may still request lead-safe work practices and I would highly urge all contractors to use lead-safe work practices.

As a certified Lead Inspector, an owner of an environmental company (Essco Safety Check) and a person with extensive knowledge about the personal environment, there are a few other things that you should know to help protect you, your family, your tenants, children and workers.

The current approved method to test for lead by a contractor is to use an EPA Approved Lead testing kit and there must be a written determination by a certified renovator using a lead test kit.

 Acceptable test kits will have to meet the following criteria:
1.)  Phase 1: Be capable of determining the presence of lead at levels >/= 1.0 mg/cm2 or > 0.5% by weight; and should have no more than 5% false negative results.
2.)  Phase 2: Criteria above; and should have no more than 10% false positive results.

For a list of approved testing kits, click here.

OR

Have a certified inspector or risk assessor provide a written determination that lead-based paint is present of not present.

As a certified lead inspector and risk assessor, my choice of testing equipment is X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzers.  They are a portable, handheld, non-destructive testing source to determine if lead and other harmful elements are present or not present. 

XRF analyzers can provide a much greater degree of accuracy to determine lead; with our analyzers we can determine if there is as little as 10ppm and review each test spectrum to ensure that lead is present or not present.

The costs for testing using XRF are slightly more than the approved testing kits; however, you receive much more valuable information about your environment.

Here is the scenario;

You hire a contractor who is certified, but they use the approved testing kits and determine that there is not lead over the “limit standard” of 5000ppm.  Because of this, the contractor gets right to work and does his job, but wants to save time and money and doesn’t use “lead safe work practices” because he has determined lead is not at the action level.

BOOM the wall is cut, dust is flying, and a day or two later your remodel is done.

I’m going to step back a second and talk regulations of lead paint standards.

In 1978, lead paint standards were adopted and the maximum allowable amount of lead in paint was 600ppm.

2008, the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) was signed and began regulating the amount of lead in children’s products.

2009 under the CPSIA the maximum allowable amount of lead on a painted surface for a children’s product is 90ppm.

2010 90ppm is the maximum allowable amount of lead to be sold in paint for consumers (there are some exemptions)

2010 the current amount of allowable lead in an area to be remodeled, 4999ppm.

Now back to our scenario;

Your contractor has determined, using an approved testing kit that there is less than 5000ppm of lead in the area to be remodeled.  But is lead really there? If so, how much lead is really there?  Are there any other potentially harmful elements such as cadmium or mercury?

It is possible for there to be almost 5000ppm of lead, which is currently 4910ppm more than is permitted today and ok to not use lead safe work practices.

XRF gives a much greater detailed image of what is present or not present.  Using X-Rays the analyzer will determine if lead is present on older, deeper paint surfaces.  With this knowledge you can help protect your family, children and the workers performing the remodel.

I see an opportunity where regulation can spur job creation, which ultimately benefits the health and wellbeing of children, homeowners and contractors.

What do you think of the RRP Rule?

Share

April 12, 2010

Star Wars figurines found with cadmium and lead, say it isn’t so Yoda!

Say it isn't so Yoda!  Cadmium and Lead found in Star Wars Figurines

Say it isn't so Yoda! Cadmium and Lead found in Star Wars Figurines

Owning an environmental testing company, I am fairly numb as to where I find certain heavy metals like lead.  However, today I must say I’m saddened to find lead and cadmium in toys I use to play with as a child and know that many of these toys are still around today, in homes with children.

Over the weekend, I was contacted by a concerned mother of two beautiful boys; she wanted to make sure that the toys and items they would play with are free from environmental toxicants.   This morning she visited our office (Essco Safety Check) to have me test some items from lead using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers, however, I found more than just lead, I found cadmium too.

The problem with today’s test is much like every other day, the randomness as to where I find, what I find.  Why does one figurine have lead or cadmium and another doesn’t?  It could be the coloring agents, or it could be involved in the making of plastic, or just a random element mixed in to the item during production.  But regardless, it is present and was found in some fairly high quantities.  

Today I tested approximately 30 Star Wars figurines and found approximately half to contain lead or cadmium.  You should note that these Star Wars figurines I tested and found with lead or cadmium are from 1977, 1979 & 1980 (marked on each figurine), they are fairly old and were manufactured before particular regulations regarding lead.  But regardless of when they were manufactured, some of these figurines contain harmful heavy metals, making them toxic toys.

Yoda contains approximately 1,800 PPM of cadmium, along with a Luke Skywalker figurine and Boba Fet figurine, while Lando Calrissian appears to have over 1% lead (over 10,000 PPM) in his vinyl cape.  Many other figurines had levels of cadmium ranging from 250 PPM to over 600 PPM. 

What does all of this mean?  You should be aware that your children could have “hand-me-down” toys that could be considered toxic toys. 

Have you given your children toys from your childhood to play with?

Share

April 6, 2010

Do you know what is in your kitchen?

Filed under: Health, News, viewpoint — Tags: , , , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 11:05 am

Let me start by saying that I am not trying to scare anyone, I just want to provide information about what we find during environmental inspections that my company performs.  It is ultimately up to you to understand your environment and make educated decisions as to what you and your children are exposed to. 

In the past few years, we have heard all too frequently about lead and now cadmium found in children’s toys and children’s jewelry.  Children’s products are regulated by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) which limits the amount of certain heavy metals in consumer products designed for children 12 years of age and younger.  In my experience, toys typically have lower amounts and frequency of possessing lead, but do you know what is in your kitchen?

Recently I was out performing an in-home inspection specifically looking for lead for a family that had three young children, all with lead found in their blood.   My company (Essco Safety Check) specializes in using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers, which is a non-destructive, accurate, efficient testing source to determine if specific elements such as lead, cadmium, arsenic or mercury are present in virtually anything (toys, ceramics, jewelry, soil, structures, etc).   In this particular home, there was actually very little lead found in the children’s products or in the structure of the home. 

When we provide testing, we typically want to test the items that people, specifically children are routinely exposed to.  I want to test the things that children put in their mouths, the items that they have regular contact with and could potentially be a source of harm.  I never hope to find lead or other harmful toxicants, but it is typically found in the average home in a variety of different products, substrates and locations.  I’m not here to say that these toxicants are going to harm or have harmed anyone; however, if present they maybe a potential source of harm.

After testing most of the children’s products that are used regularly and specifically placed in their children’s mouth, I proceeded to the kitchen to further analyze items that could potentially be the source of lead in the children.  Now in my experience, the kitchen typically possesses the most amounts of potentially harmful metals, specifically in ceramics.  This home did have some heavy metals in their ceramics, and in one case, a ceramic piece of cookware was found with lead over 5500 PPM. 

With a ceramic, the most important thing to look at (besides the elemental makeup) is the condition of the glaze.  If the condition of the glaze of a ceramic is not compromised, you should not have to worry about the makeup of that ceramic.  However, if the ceramic in question has a compromised glaze (there is a crack, chip or blemish) you should take note of what that ceramic is made of.  Unfortunately the only way to know what the ceramic is made of is to have it tested.

The ceramic found with lead did have a compromised glaze, and the owner decided not to use this item any more (it was given to me to use as an educational display piece).  But in this kitchen I found something that I’ve never seen before.   I found lead in a plastic ladle! 

Black plastic ladle found with lead (750 PPM)

Black plastic ladle found with lead (750 PPM)

I’ve seen lead all over the place in the home and specifically the kitchen, but not in a serving utensil.  I’ve found lead and other toxicants (cadmium and arsenic) in ceramics, pots and pans and even a cutting board.  I’ve had conversations with toxicologists and elemental specialists from the FDA.  Do you know that your coffee cup is regulated by the FDA (inside of the cup) and CPSC (outside of the cup)?

The amount of lead found in the ladle was approximately 750 PPM.  This level is over twice the total content level for a children’s product (CPSIA), but this product is not regulated as a child’s product.  I’m not suggesting that this ladle is even the source of this specific case of lead found in children’s blood, but lead was found in a product that is exposed to a variety of different heat conditions , as well as, the potential for acids (like tomato soup) and children are exposed to  and this type of product.

As I said at the beginning, I am not here to scare anyone; I am here to provide insight and knowledge.  I’m not saying that the ladle or cookware was the cause of lead in the children from this home, but lead was found in the kitchen and in consumer products that children are exposed to on a regular basis.

Do you know what is in your kitchen?

Share

April 2, 2010

Autism Day! Autistic families are more aware of their environment!

Filed under: Health, News, viewpoint — Tags: , , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 12:46 pm

Today…on Autism Day, April 2, 2010 I wanted to repost a blog I’ve written about autistic families and their desire to know what is in their environment. I’m going to do that below, but the first thing I did today was post a comment on CNNs blog by Dr. Sanjay Gupta 

My goal of the post was not to scare anyone or sell my services; I simply want to provide knowledge and insight that I have obtained over the past two plus years of providing testing services. In all my testing, there has been one constant, when I test for parents of autistic children and they inform me of their children’s blood metals, I do find the same metals in the consumer products and items these children are exposed to and regularly use; to me this a big coincidence. As I said in my initial comment, I’m not saying that heavy metals are the cause of autism but I have found them in 100% of autistic homes I’ve tested. I suspect that these metals found in the blood of these autistic children are masking the ability to properly treat autism and until you remove these metals from these children’s environment, you may not even be able to treat autism properly. I apologize if you thought my intention was to scare or make money, I’d much rather be out of business because consumer products didn’t have potentially harmful toxicants. I really just wanted to add to the conversation and hope that potential studies can be done. I have data on consumer products and I want to help anyway I can, right now, information is what we provide so people and businesses can make educated decisions as to what is in their environment and ultimately what they are exposed to.

On August 7th, 2010 make sure you visit the Jubilee Farm in Carnation for Washington’s 10th Annual Autism Day. We will be onsite providing free consumer product testing and if our grant from the EPA comes in, we will provide free blood lead screening to all participants.

Here is my reposted article:

“Autistic families are more aware of their environment”

I was recently asked, “Who are my biggest clients?” My business provides elemental information to a variety of different customer bases; consumers, businesses, industries and government. Each group has different reasons for the knowledge we provide. But there is one specific sub-group which seems to be most concerned about their environment, parents of autistic children.

The topic of autism and heavy metals is generally only discussed in a small circle of people. To be honest my knowledge of autism and environmental concerns, prior to 2007 and the start of my business (www.essco-safetycheck.com), was very limited about autism and about environmental concerns, “paper or plastic?” But my perceptions have changed dramatically, not only about autism and environmental concerns but how we can help people to improve lives with knowledge of your environment.

When I answered the question, of course I mentioned a few names of businesses, but when I thought about it I said that the one group of people who are my biggest clients and most concerned about the environment are families with autistic children.

I was asked “Why?” Now, I first want to emphasize that I am not a doctor or scientist, maybe I’m becoming a researcher, but this is just my insight and opinion.

For two years I have been to many consumers homes providing XRF testing, in-home assessments for potentially harmful elements in consumer products (toys, ceramics, jewelry, I want to test the things that you have a direct relationship to), housing, structures, soil, you name it and I’ve probably tested it. Dozens of these homes have been homes for families with autistic children.

These families have a desire to know what is in their environment. Their children have health and behavioral issues; in each and every home with autistic children (that I have been to), the parents also inform me that their children have heavy metals in their blood. Not just one metal, but several, in one home I was shown the child’s blood metals lab report and 12 or 13 different metals were present, including; lead, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, antimony, tin, chromium, copper, and others.

What I find interesting is that in each and every home with autistic children (that I have been to and provided XRF testing), I find the same metals in the consumer products that are used around the home, by the children, that the parents have informed me are in the children’s blood.

I am not saying that the metals in the consumer products are the cause of autism, but I have found the same metals in the consumer products in the home of the autistic child that the parents tell us are in their children’s blood. Is it coincidence? I’m not sure; I have had my beliefs formed from over two years of providing testing services to help people know what is in their environment.

I suspect we are all subjected to low levels of all of the elements we find. Maybe it is the lack or inability for these children to properly process, excrete these metals (and chemicals when you think of all that we are potentially exposed to) we are all bombarded with. Most people can process the metals, but for those that can’t?

If we can help to inform parents what is in their environment, these parents can potentially reduce or eliminate exposure to the same metals found in their children’s blood. If you remove the harmful metals from the child’s environment, will they eventually be removed from the child’s blood?

The parents of autistic children are concerned because even low doses of some of these metals can be very harmful to the health and wellbeing of their children. How are these metals getting into their children? I can’t exactly say, but we are here to help people know what is in their environment and reduce potential toxic element exposure.

Essco Safety Check

Promote Your Page Too

Powered by WordPress