Know what is in your environment

March 26, 2010

CPSC held a webinar today – A guide for small businesses for complying with the CPSIA.

Filed under: Events, News, Regulation — Tags: , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 12:01 pm

Today, Friday, March 26, 2010, 11:00 a.m. EDT the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) held a webinar to help small businesses understand complying with the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), specifically with the Handmade Toy Alliance (HTA).

Gib Mullan, Assistant Executive Director, Office of Compliance and Field Operations for the U.S. CPSC gave the presentation as a “flow chart” and a “guide to help” webinar attendees understand which requirements apply to their products.

Essco Safety Check did not submit any specific questions for this webinar, but is constantly fielding questions about the CPSIA from small businesses.  It is our goal as a company to help businesses know what their products are made of using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzers.

Here are some highlights to what the CPSC presented and where to find the specific information as well as some questions asked.
——————————————————————————————————————————————

The first basic question is do you make a children’s product? 

A “children’s product” means a consumer product designed or intended primarily for children 12 years of age or younger. In determining whether a consumer product is primarily intended for a child 12 years of age or younger, the following factors will be considered:

• A statement by the manufacturer about the intended use of the product, including a label on the product if such statement is reasonable.
• Whether the product is represented in its packaging, display, promotion or advertising as appropriate for use by children 12 years of age or younger.
• Whether the product is commonly recognized by consumers as being intended for use by a child 12 years of age or younger.

Requirements include:

CPSIA Section 101. Children’s Products Containing Lead; Lead Paint Rule http

CPSIA Section 102. Mandatory Third Party Testing for Certain Children’s Products 

CPSIA Section 103. Tracking Labels for Children’s Products 

Statement of Policy: Testing and Certification of Lead Content in Children’s Products

Section 101 of the CPSIA says that products designed or intended primarily for children 12 years old and younger (“children’s products”) cannot contain more than 300 parts per million (ppm) of lead in any accessible part, this is the “lead content limit.”  In addition to the 300 ppm content limit, there is a 90 ppm limit on lead in paint used on certain products such as furniture and children’s toys.

The CPSC issued guidance in August, 2009 to determine accessible parts.  

There have been determinations to identify materials whole lead content will not exceed 100 ppm and they include natural products, dyed and un-dyed textiles, cotton, wool, wood, paper, precious and semi precious stones.

But they do not include metal or plastic fasteners such as buttons, screws, grommets or sippers used in apparel or elsewhere.

Section 102 – Mandatory third party testing for certain children’s products.

Children’s products must be certified based on testing by a recognized third party test laboratory.  These requirements are being phased in over time.

Lead limits on most children’s products do not have to be certified until 2/10/2011 However, children’s jewelry must be certified to the 300 ppm lead content limit if that product was manufactured after 8/14/09 and any painted product would need to meet 90 ppm lead content limit.

Third-Party Testing of Children’s Products

The new legislation imposes an additional third-party testing requirement for all consumer products primarily intended for children twelve years of age or younger. Every manufacturer (including an importer) or private labeler of a children’s product must have its product tested by an accredited independent testing lab and, based on the testing, must issue a certificate that the product meets all applicable CPSC requirements.

CPSC is given authority either to accredit laboratories (“third party conformity assessment bodies”) for doing the required testing of children’s products or to designate independent accrediting organizations to accredit the testing laboratories, with one exception. The Commission itself must accredit laboratories that are controlled by the manufacturer of the children’s product in question. To assure their impartiality, government labs must also meet strict standards of independence. The CPSC must maintain an up-to-date list of accredited labs on its web site. CPSC has authority to suspend or terminate a laboratory’s accreditation in appropriate circumstances.

The third-party testing and certification requirements for children’s products are phased in on a rolling schedule. The statute requires the CPSC to issue laboratory accreditation regimes for different categories of children’s products. Once the CPSC issues the laboratory accreditation requirement for that category of children’s products, each children’s product in that category that is manufactured more than ninety days after that date must be tested and certified to the applicable requirements. The schedule for CPSC to issue the laboratory accreditation requirements and the certification schedule is set forth on the timeline shown in the chart below.

  CPSC Publishes Accreditation Procedure Third Party Testing required
Lead Paint September 22, 2008* December 22, 2008
Cribs and Pacifiers October 2008 January 2009
Samll Parts November 2008 February 2009
Metal Jewelry December 2008 March 2009
Baby Bouncers, Walkers and Jumpers March 2009 June 2009
300 ppm Lead Content May 2009 August 2009
CPSC Children’s Product Safety Rules June 2009 September 2009

To find a recognized lab for the specific scope of inspection you are looking for please visit http://www.cpsc.gov/cgi-bin/labapplist.aspx, make sure that the lab is certified for your specific test requirements.  Not all labs are certified for all testing procedures.

Section 103 Tracking labels for children’s products

Section 103(a) of the new law requires manufacturers to have a tracking label or other distinguishing permanent mark on any consumer product primarily intended for children twelve and younger. The tracking label must contain certain basic information, including the source of the product, the date of manufacture and more detailed information on the manufacturing process such as a batch or run number. The scope of this provision is quite broad in that it applies to all children’s products, including, but not limited to, items such as clothing or shoes not just toys and other regulated products. Congress modified the requirement for tracking labels with the phrase “to the extent practicable” recognizing that it may not be practical for permanent distinguishing marks to be printed on small toys and other small products that are manufactured and shipped without individual packaging.

The Commission has the authority to issue a rule further defining the detail required in the tracking labels. Moreover, the Commission also has the ability to require in the future that the additional information contained on tracking labels for children’s products be expanded to cover all consumer products.

Section 103(c) of the new law also addresses the types of claims a manufacturer can make regarding its compliance with mandatory or voluntary safety rules. After October 12, 2008, no product packaging, advertisements or labels can refer to any safety standard unless the product complies with that standard.

Effective Date: The requirement for tracking labels is effective one year after the date of enactment or August 14, 2009. The requirements prohibiting advertising claims are effective 60 days after enactment or October 13, 2008.

Here is the Statement of Policy: Interpretation and Enforcement Of Section 103(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act

Which requirements apply?
Is your product a children’s article or furniture that bear paint or similar surface coating?
Is your product intended for under 36 months?
Is it a child care article for children under 4?
Durable nursery product for children under 5?
Is your product a toy?
Is it clothing or children’s sleepwear?
The paint limit standard under the CPSIA, Section 101 is 90 ppm and took effect on 8/14/09.   It applies the same to items as previsouly sold under the 600 ppm limit

  • Paint sold to consumers
  • Articles intended for children
  • Household furniture
  • Children’s products manufactured after 8/14/09 must be certified to the 90 ppm limit if they bear paint or similar surface coatings.

    “Small parts” ban for all items that are intended for children under 36 months of age.

    Small parts are “as received” or under “use and abuse” testing.  Basically you can have little parts when you open a package or if it is tested for example using a pull test or drop test, small parts can’t be the result from the test.
     Small parts are those fitting ht a small part cylinder (it is close to the size of a toilet paper roll, but a little smaller)

    Here is the regulatory summary for small parts regulations, toys and products intended for use by children under 3 years old

    Here is the regulatory summary for lead contain paint

    Here is the regulatory summary for children’s sleepwear

    Here is the regulatory summary for clothing textiles

    Other regulatory summaries can be found here

    Phthalates

    Section 108. Products Containing Certain Phthalates

    Good news!  Phthalate testing is for plasticized components only.  The limit is 1000 ppm for the 6 phthalates.

    There was brief mention of:

    Section 104. Standards and Consumer Registration of Durable Nursery Products

    and

    Section 106. Mandatory Toy Safety Standards

    Some questions included:

    When does a choke hazard warning need to be used?
    If you make an item for children under 3 years old, small parts are banned.  Toy or games for children 3 to 6 years old, but not all products, some craft products are not thought of as toys or games and thus a choke warning is not needed.

    Tracking labels, what does ascertain mean? 
    Ascertain means information about the product doesn’t’t need it to be on the product as long as the consumer has the ability to get to the information 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.  No phone numbers unless that phone is manned 24 hours a day.  A web solution is the best choice if you don’t want to put this information on your product.

    Children’s jewelry, is it the same definition as California? And are hair accessories considered jewelry? 
    Hair accessories are not considered jewelry by the CPSC, the they are considered accessories by California.

    Screen printing?  There is not just one type of screen printing.  The key to regulation is to the process and if that process creates a surface coating? 
    If that process creates a surface coating than that would require a lead test.  Many if not most create a coating and subject to the 90 ppm lead limit.  If the process/ink/dye sinks in to the fabric than you are subject to the 300 ppm limit.  If you have dye, you can do determinations and take advantage of these rules and say a dye is ok.  You must be confident and knowledgeable about the products.

    This was just some highlights from today’s webinar.  The CPSC will be posting a link to the video, when they make it available, I will post a link to it here.

    If you have any questions, please contact us at info@essco-safetycheck.com

    Share

    Essco Safety Check

    Promote Your Page Too

    March 24, 2010

    The HTA and CPSC will talk about the CPSIA and Small Businesses via a webinar this Friday

    Filed under: Events, News — Tags: , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 1:28 pm

    This Friday, March 26th at 11:00 a.m. EDT Senior officials from the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and members of the Handmade Toy Alliance  will talk about how the CPSIA has impacted small businesses. Jay Howell and Gib Mullan will represent the CPSC.

    This is an opportunity for small business owners to get answers to questions both specific and general about how the CPSIA affects your business.

    Please send questions to HTAquestions@cpsc.gov before, during and after the webinar.

    The webinar will begin with presentations by both officials from the CPSC and that will be followed with a question and answer session.

    Essco Safety Check will participate in the webinar and our ultimate goal is to help simulate businesses, creating jobs and improving lives by utilizing X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers.

    Please visit the Handmade Toy Alliance blog about this webinar or to participate in this webinar visit: www.cpsc.gov/webcast/index.html

    ***(The CPSC email address for questions will be active for only a month after the webinar to follow up on questions.)

    Share

    March 21, 2010

    Healthy Kids & Green Parenting Fair

    Filed under: About the business, Events, News — Tags: , , , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 8:32 am
    Healthy Kids & Green Parenting Fair Tacoma, WA 3-20-10

    Healthy Kids & Green Parenting Fair Tacoma, WA 3-20-10

    The Healthy Kids & Green Parenting Fair was held yesterday in Tacoma, WA.  Hundreds of people attended some to have their toys and consumer products tested for heavy metals, others brought their children to have their blood screened for lead, all came to browse the 30 or so venders and learn about new “organic” products.

    Essco Safety Check provided free consumer product testing using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzers.  Toys were tested, children’s plates and cups, children’s jewelry, parents wedding rings and women’s handbags. 

    Lead and cadmium were both found in some of the items, but overall the children’s products tested were found with little if any lead or cadmium.  However, a woman’s handbag strap was found to be made with PVC as well as over lead over 1200 PPM.   In one woman’s wedding ring, cadmium was found over 1000 PPM.

    Essco Safety Check is proud to help people and businesses know what is in their environment.  If we can help you understand your environment, you can make educated decisions as to what you and your children are exposed to or about the products you sell. 

    Over the years of providing testing services, we have collected a variety of samples of products that contain harmful heavy metals. 

    Here are some of the items that have lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury.

    Products we've found with harmful heavy metals (Lead, Cadmium, Arsenic & Mercury)

    Products we've found with harmful heavy metals (Lead, Cadmium, Arsenic & Mercury)

    If a consumer product that you or your children use regularly has heavy metals in it, it does not mean that that product will harm you or your children, however, there is the potential for harm.  With knowledge you can mitigate harm. 

    Know what is in your environment.

    Share

    March 12, 2010

    CPSC Issues Warning about High Levels of Cadmium in Holiday-Themed Charm Bracelets

    Filed under: About the business, Health, News — Tags: , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 8:06 am

    There has been a warning issued by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) about Children’s Metal Charm Braclets, from importer Buy-Rite Designs, of Freehold N.J.  These items were sold at discount and dollar-type stores nationwide between 2006 and March 2009 for about $1.   Buy-Rite Designs is no longer in business.

    Consumers should stop using the products immediately.

    These bracelets contain high levels of cadmium.  Cadmium is a harmful toxicant which can cause adverse health effects and is a known carcinogen. 

    No injuries have been reported.

    Here are photos of the items with Cadmium warnings. If these items are found, consumers should immediately take these charms away from children.

    Rudolph

    Snowman 

    Click here to see the CPSC issued warning.

    Essco Safety Check was involved in the first cadmium issued recall by assisting the Associated Press with data that lead to an investigation about cadmium found in children’s jewelry.

    Know what is in your environment and prevent harm!

    Share

    March 10, 2010

    Results of the Handmade Toy Alliance CPSIA Small Business Survey

    This is a survey that was conducted by our friends at the Handmade Toy Alliance (HTA), an organization working to save small batch producers of children’s products from the CPSIA. 

    ***************************************************

    Below are the results of our survey of small batch children’s product manufacturers and retailers which we conducted this past weekend. 223 business owners participated in the survey, 135 of whom are HTA members. That means that we achieved a 95% confidence rate with a +/- 4.9% confidence interval for the purposes of describing the entire population of 420 businesses who are members of the HTA.

    We’re sharing this report with congress and the CPSC in hopes that it will help guide their legislation and rulemaking. One thing this survey makes clear is that there are a lot of very low volume toymakers and children’s products manufacturers in this country who should not be overlooked.


    Handmade Toy Alliance CPSIA Survey Results

    Note: Revenue data was also collected and shared with congress and the CPSC but was omitted from this public version of the report for privacy reasons.

    In short, this survey of business found that 49.8% are internet based retailers and 43.9% are home based manufacturers.   39.0% have been in business for 1-3 years (the CPSIA was signed into law in August 2008).  83.4% employ either the owner or 1-2 employees maximum and 66% of all these business make or sell less than 5000 total units per year.

    Expect to see more details as to the potential economic impact for these business in the coming days.  In the meantime, Essco Safety Check did write up an ecomonic impact of the CPSIA, you can see that blog here.

    Share

    March 3, 2010

    Parents and grandparents should be wary of the jewelry that you give your children or grandchildren.

    Parents and grandparents should be wary of the jewelry that you give your children or grandchildren. For over two years I have been operating an environmental technology company, providing X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) testing for moms and dads, businesses, industry and government. Our desire is to help people and businesses “know what is in their environment” provide information, create jobs, stimulate business and improve lives.

    XRF testing is a non-destructive means to identify potentially harmful elements such as lead and cadmium in virtually anything and being an owner of such a company provides me with the ability to test the items that my family, specifically children, may come in contact with.

    Last week we gathered up some items that were given to my nieces by their grandmother and tested them using our equipment. With this knowledge you have the ability to make simple decisions that can mitigate potential harm.

    I tested several necklaces; some were brand new when given to my nieces and others were very old, my nieces great grandmothers. Testing results found lead levels over 30 percent in two of the charms on the necklaces; these charms also had antimony at close to 1 percent. I also found cadmium in a plastic beaded necklace over 7000 Parts Per Million (PPM) and lower amounts in other jewelry.

    Heavy metals found in these items

    Heavy metals found in these items

    Now just because these items had potentially harmful metals in them, doesn’t mean that they are going to harm my nieces. However, those metals are present in those items and the simple act of removing these items from “regular” use mitigates the potential harm. This doesn’t mean to throw these items out; this could create an environmental problem and some of these items are family heirlooms and should be kept and shared, when appropriate. However, if know what is in your environment, you can mitigate potential harm.

    So what can you do?

    You should be wary of the things you give your children or grand children. Make sure that your children, who are old enough to understand, don’t put these items in their mouth.

    In a blog written by CPSC Chairwoman Inez Tenenbaum:

    Because of these recent developments, I have a message for parents, grandparents and caregivers: Do not allow young children to be given or to play with cheap metal jewelry, especially when they are unsupervised…

    We have proof that lead in children’s jewelry is dangerous and was pervasive in the marketplace. To prevent young children from possibly being exposed to lead, cadmium or any other hazardous heavy metal, take the jewelry away.

    Parents should know that swallowing, sucking on or chewing a metal charm or necklace could result in exposure to lead, cadmium or other heavy metals, which are known to be toxic at certain levels of exposure.

    If you truly want to know what you may be giving your children or grandchildren, you could have these items tested by XRF analyzers, but there are costs involved to do XRF testing.

    Essco Safety Check will be offering FREE XRF testing on Saturday, March 20th, 2010 at South Park Community Center, 4851 South Tacoma Way at the Healthy Kids and Green Parenting Fair

     If you are would like to have any of your “family heirlooms” inspected for lead, cadmium or other heavy metals, please feel free to join us in Tacoma on March 20th.

    If you have any questions or comments, please let me know and i will try and answer your questions.

    March 2, 2010

    Daiso hit with $2.05 Million Civil Penalty for lead-laden toys

    Filed under: News, Regulation, viewpoint — Tags: , , , , , — Seth Goldberg @ 4:45 pm

    The Consumer Product Safety Commission has announced that the U.S. Subsidiaries of Daiso, a Japanese retailer, has agreed to pay a fine of $2.05 Million civil penalty and stop importing children’s products due to alleged violations of federal safety laws.  Daiso must also demonstrate to the CPSC that it has sufficient knowledge of and is in compliance of CPSC safety standards and testing requirements.

    Daiso California LLC and Daiso Seattle LLC have had a total of five recalls for 698 toys and other children’s products since 2008.  These recalls were for lead, phthalates, strangulation and choking hazards.  This is a relatively small number of products recalled compared to the several million recalled by Mattel in 2007, of which Mattel was only fined $2.3 Million.

    “This landmark agreement for the injunction sets a precedent for any firm attempting to distribute hazardous products to our nation’s children,” Commission Chairwoman Inez Tenenbaum said.  “We are committed to the safety of children’s products, and we will use the full force of our enforcement powers to prevent the sale of harmful products.”

    A senior executive at Daiso said the company accepts the fine and wants to make sure the products it imports are safe.

    I would recommend that Daiso utilize X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzers as part of a reasonable testing/safety program to help determine if their products have harmful regulated metals such as lead or cadmium in their consumer products.   XRF Analyzers can help detect if elements are present of not present, they are non-destructive, accurate and a cost effective solution that can helping save businesses money while providing information that can ultimately lead to compliance with regulations.

    You can visit Daiso’s web page about their recalls at www.daisorecall.com

    Powered by WordPress